Insourcing Global Trade Management

Most importers and exporters are careful to manage inventory, tariffs and compliance. In a recent survey of trade consultants conducted by Integration Point, every respondent (100%) indicated that their client companies perform denied party screening and recognize foreign trade zones. However, most outsource this work to consultants, freight forwarders or other third party service providers. The cost of internal automation and process control has been too high for most importers and exporters to do on their own. Acquiring and maintaining a trade management system and data has been too much of a burden for smaller companies to adopt on top of their core business needs within manufacturing, sales and marketing and supplier relations.

Now however, with increasing government fines and liability being imposed, companies often don't want to entrust a third party for all compliance requirements. In a recent case, Cabela's, an outdoor equipment outfitter based in Nebraska, agreed to pay a $680,000 civil penalty to settle allegations that it committed 152 violations of the Export Administration Regulations. The law stipulates that even jail time may be imposed on offenders. As such, compliance failure is just too risky for any sized importer and exporter.

To avoid such liabilities, importers and exporters must be able to clearly prove that they applied "reasonable care" to all traded goods. While third party (outsourced) solutions can do this, many importers and exporters want tighter control of the process and paperwork. For example, every respondent in the Integration Point survey indicated that they want to store product certificates for future reference, even if the compliance checks are being done by a third party.

To view the full article, visit Industry Week at http://www.industryweek.com/articles/insourcing_global_trade_management_18650.aspx?Page=2&SectionID=4?ShowAll=1